Failhorse wrote:Honestly. Put this into perspective. Sure their views are fucked up. But they are closed on Sundays and pay for their employees to go to college.
Anyone who owns a smart phone has done more damage to humanity than Chick-Fil-A will ever do.
Guy wrote:Also, trust me on this, I didn't choose to be gay. I wanna family, and I think I would have that pretty easy by now if I was hetero. I think it about it all the time really, but I just flip a switch and say... hey I am hetero and love pussy. Just doesn't work that way.
Vintage Cholent wrote:Yup, still highly unconstitutional. And I don't give a shit what liberals think, this is not cool think of the jobs lost due to this bs.
Smeemo wrote:Yep, looks like it. "Aldermanic privilege" = defer to the ward dictator's whim? Thanks for the link.
Vintage Cholent wrote:Like I said, I think the hate is uncalled for. However know this, chick-fil-e still employs many people who disagree with the homophobic rhetoric that their CEO contributes to. Causing the company to lose jobs just because their CEO donates to christians is un constitutional like I said before.
Maringue wrote:Vintage Cholent wrote:Like I said, I think the hate is uncalled for. However know this, chick-fil-e still employs many people who disagree with the homophobic rhetoric that their CEO contributes to. Causing the company to lose jobs just because their CEO donates to christians is un constitutional like I said before.
If I cause them to lose jobs because I refuse to give them my money, that's totally Constitutional.
VoltySquirrel wrote:Maringue wrote:Vintage Cholent wrote:Like I said, I think the hate is uncalled for. However know this, chick-fil-e still employs many people who disagree with the homophobic rhetoric that their CEO contributes to. Causing the company to lose jobs just because their CEO donates to christians is un constitutional like I said before.
If I cause them to lose jobs because I refuse to give them my money, that's totally Constitutional.
That is. However, blocking their business entirely in a city like Chicago totally isn't.
VoltySquirrel wrote:However, blocking their business entirely in a city like Chicago totally isn't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest