Guy wrote:To be honost, only people who should really have a say these kinda matters are... you guessed it... women.
I can't rap my mind around a man trying to tell a woman what do with her body... this isn't a theocracy or dark ages.
To be honost abortions, imo, are situational. These people who want the baby to live, at the expense to the mother, yet don't want to support the baby then mock her for trying to get help with welfare.
Normal everyday women, go threw a lot, when they don't want a child. You could say hey, practice birth control!
But you got the bible nuts (and any other reglionut) and the Abstinence crowd teaching nothing of self protection, birth control, or proper sexual education.... just saying Just say no... to SEX! or God thinks sex is dirty... but he lubz childernenz. ect.
What about rape victims? Or a woman that will easly die while trying to develop and/or deliver the baby?
I am a little uneasy about the paris hiltons of the world with a platnum membership pass to a planning clinic... but again, I am not a woman... and imo, have no say in the whole thing.
My only thought about abortion that shouldn't be allowed is if the father really wants the child, and will even take over the child when it is born. Woman doesn't like said man, and has abortion reguardless of his feelings. Doesn't seem right to me... buutttt.. I am not a heterosexual, so I really don't have a say in this either.
Abstinence can be very unhealthy, mainly cause they even say masterbation is bad too. (Yes, I think women masterbate too... I think.)
Can cause a lot of mental problems. Sex is actually a need and not want, masterbation feels the need. Denying your needs usually ends pretty badly... see: hunger, thurst, comfort, sleep, and stress relief.
Anyone remember this video?
tl;dr... if you're not a woman, you just need to get you and your magic book, out of thier biz.
duck wrote:Voters in missippi will be faced to vote for this new constitution amendment,
stanley the manley wrote:duck wrote:Voters in missippi will be faced to vote for this new constitution amendment,
im confused, is this a state amendment? one state cant change the constitution by itself
Maringue wrote:stanley the manley wrote:duck wrote:Voters in missippi will be faced to vote for this new constitution amendment,
im confused, is this a state amendment? one state cant change the constitution by itself
It's an amendment to the state's constitution. Somehow they think that by making it a state constitutional amendment they won't get bitch slapped by every court in the country, which they are going to be.
Maringue wrote:First Mississippi is trying to retain its title as "the safest state to be an unborn child." Unfortunately once that child is born they don't give a fuck.
Secondly, this law will never, I repeat, NEVER be allowed even if the pass it. They want to have embryos declared people. Unfortunately they are not because they can't own property, vote, or do all of that other people shit. Secondly, the Supreme Court has routinely held that abortion laws that do not have exceptions for the health of the mother are unconstitutional.
Basically, Mississippi is trying to reassure the rest of the states that it is indeed the dumbest and most backward state in the union.
WHAMbulance wrote:On the whole "a fetus being a person topic", a fetus is not a person IMO. Until that baby has taken a lungful of grimy, earth-bourne air, they aren't a person.
While you can make the argument, "What if this baby was the cure for cancer?" well, what if I grew wings and started pooping unicorns?
How about focusing on aiding the population you have, not trying to increase it.
Ackybur wrote:Giving my personal opinion here: I think it's a ridiculous law. I can say right now if I was to get pregnant I'd abort it. I'm in a place in my life where it's going on the right track and a baby would ruin everything. The costs, damage and attention it needs is too much too soon. If it was made into an amendment I can promise there would be a lot more "stairs" incidents.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Ackybur wrote:Giving my personal opinion here: I think it's a ridiculous law. I can say right now if I was to get pregnant I'd abort it. I'm in a place in my life where it's going on the right track and a baby would ruin everything. The costs, damage and attention it needs is too much too soon. If it was made into an amendment I can promise there would be a lot more "stairs" incidents.
What do you mean by "stairs"?
If it means what I think it means, I can guarantee you that that won't work.
If you miscarry, I can guarantee that there'll be a criminal investigation into whether or not you purposefully tried to terminate the pregnancy. That's why Utah passed that law criminalizing miscarriage (though the flip side was too obvious to ignore).
Guy wrote:If any of you have (or are planning to have kids at sometime in your life) do them a favor.
No matter what your religion or options on things... be forward with your kids. Even while young, kids know more than they usually let on.
Teach them about the basic functions of sex, when they are young. Go get that movie: "The Miracle of Life."
Go over how a baby is made, the differences between males and females bodies and machanics.
1) Don't tell them it is dirty, shameful, useless act. Doing this makes them feel shameful about thier bodies.
2) Tell them it is a pleasurable, normal, fullfilling act... of love. Tell them don't not to be ashamed of thier bodies, that they are beautiful.
While teaching them about sexually aggessive acts, and how to protect themselves from them while they are children. How they are dangerous and can damage thier bodies or make them sick. Tell them if anyone ever tries to hurt them tell them to tell you asap, and you will love and protect them no matter what. If you go with saying that sex is shameful, chances are your child's guilt will be multiplied and won't think you will believe them.
When they get to preteen-early teenage years you need to teach them about self protection, and birth control.
The different types of STDs and other ailments that can be caught during light makeout-heavy petting sessions.
Tell them that masterbation is normal, healthy, and that you would rather them do that instead of having sex at thier age.
Don't be a fool and think your teen won't make attempts at having sex.
Teach them about how that with great pleasure comes great responsibility. That they must practice safe sex, how to check thier partner for STDs, and to make sure that they arn't pressured into having sex in the 1st place. (Yes, guys can be pressured into sex.)
Tell your daughters about the types of birth controls, go over the risks of taking birth control pills, and most of all if she gets pregnant that you will be there for her, and will support her decisions... and that she will have to grow up and be a woman.
Tell your sons about the types of birth controls, how to properly take care of a condom, how to put it on and how to take it off away from a female after he is finished. To wear a condom even if a woman says she is on birth control, as a way to protect himself from possible STDs and accidental pregnancy. Tell him if he gets a woman pregnant that he much grow up and do what is right, that he has to be there and support her with her decisions. You must let him know you will be there for him as well.
I am just babbling on here, but I think the world would be a better place if people were more open about this.
I have no idea what your feelings are about sexual attraction, but remember when did you make the choice to what sex your attacted too?
Well I am off to play with my Sims.
Guy wrote:If any of you have (or are planning to have kids at sometime in your life) do them a favor.
No matter what your religion or options on things... be forward with your kids. Even while young, kids know more than they usually let on.
Teach them about the basic functions of sex, when they are young. Go get that movie: "The Miracle of Life."
Go over how a baby is made, the differences between males and females bodies and machanics.
1) Don't tell them it is dirty, shameful, useless act. Doing this makes them feel shameful about thier bodies.
2) Tell them it is a pleasurable, normal, fullfilling act... of love. Tell them don't not to be ashamed of thier bodies, that they are beautiful.
While teaching them about sexually aggessive acts, and how to protect themselves from them while they are children. How they are dangerous and can damage thier bodies or make them sick. Tell them if anyone ever tries to hurt them tell them to tell you asap, and you will love and protect them no matter what. If you go with saying that sex is shameful, chances are your child's guilt will be multiplied and won't think you will believe them.
When they get to preteen-early teenage years you need to teach them about self protection, and birth control.
The different types of STDs and other ailments that can be caught during light makeout-heavy petting sessions.
Tell them that masterbation is normal, healthy, and that you would rather them do that instead of having sex at thier age.
Don't be a fool and think your teen won't make attempts at having sex.
Teach them about how that with great pleasure comes great responsibility. That they must practice safe sex, how to check thier partner for STDs, and to make sure that they arn't pressured into having sex in the 1st place. (Yes, guys can be pressured into sex.)
Tell your daughters about the types of birth controls, go over the risks of taking birth control pills, and most of all if she gets pregnant that you will be there for her, and will support her decisions... and that she will have to grow up and be a woman.
Tell your sons about the types of birth controls, how to properly take care of a condom, how to put it on and how to take it off away from a female after he is finished. To wear a condom even if a woman says she is on birth control, as a way to protect himself from possible STDs and accidental pregnancy. Tell him if he gets a woman pregnant that he much grow up and do what is right, that he has to be there and support her with her decisions. You must let him know you will be there for him as well.
I am just babbling on here, but I think the world would be a better place if people were more open about this.
I have no idea what your feelings are about sexual attraction, but remember when did you make the choice to what sex your attacted too?
Well I am off to play with my Sims.
Guy wrote:If any of you have (or are planning to have kids at sometime in your life) do them a favor.
No matter what your religion or options on things... be forward with your kids. Even while young, kids know more than they usually let on.
Teach them about the basic functions of sex, when they are young. Go get that movie: "The Miracle of Life."
Go over how a baby is made, the differences between males and females bodies and machanics.
1) Don't tell them it is dirty, shameful, useless act. Doing this makes them feel shameful about thier bodies.
2) Tell them it is a pleasurable, normal, fullfilling act... of love. Tell them don't not to be ashamed of thier bodies, that they are beautiful.
While teaching them about sexually aggessive acts, and how to protect themselves from them while they are children. How they are dangerous and can damage thier bodies or make them sick. Tell them if anyone ever tries to hurt them tell them to tell you asap, and you will love and protect them no matter what. If you go with saying that sex is shameful, chances are your child's guilt will be multiplied and won't think you will believe them.
When they get to preteen-early teenage years you need to teach them about self protection, and birth control.
The different types of STDs and other ailments that can be caught during light makeout-heavy petting sessions.
Tell them that masterbation is normal, healthy, and that you would rather them do that instead of having sex at thier age.
Don't be a fool and think your teen won't make attempts at having sex.
Teach them about how that with great pleasure comes great responsibility. That they must practice safe sex, how to check thier partner for STDs, and to make sure that they arn't pressured into having sex in the 1st place. (Yes, guys can be pressured into sex.)
Tell your daughters about the types of birth controls, go over the risks of taking birth control pills, and most of all if she gets pregnant that you will be there for her, and will support her decisions... and that she will have to grow up and be a woman.
Tell your sons about the types of birth controls, how to properly take care of a condom, how to put it on and how to take it off away from a female after he is finished. To wear a condom even if a woman says she is on birth control, as a way to protect himself from possible STDs and accidental pregnancy. Tell him if he gets a woman pregnant that he much grow up and do what is right, that he has to be there and support her with her decisions. You must let him know you will be there for him as well.
I am just babbling on here, but I think the world would be a better place if people were more open about this.
I have no idea what your feelings are about sexual attraction, but remember when did you make the choice to what sex your attacted too?
Well I am off to play with my Sims.
Ackybur wrote:
Well, there is a difference between an accident and on purpose. I do know of the law where you can't force a miscarriage.. But who are they to say the shoe at the top of the stairs wasn't what caused it? It's just an example of the extremes people will go to.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Ackybur wrote:
Well, there is a difference between an accident and on purpose. I do know of the law where you can't force a miscarriage.. But who are they to say the shoe at the top of the stairs wasn't what caused it? It's just an example of the extremes people will go to.
They don't care whether it's an accident or not; the law assumes that if a woman miscarries, she deliberately did something to the baby for it to die. Most women miscarry because of medical issues, not because they tried to perform a DIY abortion. This law would have put already grieving mothers through a second world of hurt by treating them like murderers even though they did nothing wrong.
Ackybur wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Ackybur wrote:
Well, there is a difference between an accident and on purpose. I do know of the law where you can't force a miscarriage.. But who are they to say the shoe at the top of the stairs wasn't what caused it? It's just an example of the extremes people will go to.
They don't care whether it's an accident or not; the law assumes that if a woman miscarries, she deliberately did something to the baby for it to die. Most women miscarry because of medical issues, not because they tried to perform a DIY abortion. This law would have put already grieving mothers through a second world of hurt by treating them like murderers even though they did nothing wrong.
Again, you're wrong. I have a friend who miscarried a year ago and it wasn't medical, it was an abusive boyfriend. Nothing police related came into it and yes she did go to a hospital where if something was suspicious they have to report it. Just thought you'd like to know.
Spyder wrote:The problem is in the amendment's fine print.
This isn't merely a matter of life or death. If a woman gets a miscarriage, then it would be considered murder. This amendment would halt Stem Cell Research and research on Embryos.
If a woman has cancer, a doctor would basically have to turn her away so he himself would not be accused of murder by giving her treatment.
The list goes on. All you women in Mississippi have my condolences.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Again, you're wrong. I have a friend who miscarried a year ago and it wasn't medical, it was an abusive boyfriend. Nothing police related came into it and yes she did go to a hospital where if something was suspicious they have to report it. Just thought you'd like to know.
Maringue wrote: Sometimes I wish we could vote states out of the Union, because NOBODY would miss Mississippi.
Maringue wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:That's a case where it was her boyfriend's fault, not hers. I haven't had the chance to read the text of the law, but I would assume that he would be held responsible for killing the fetus (since he induced the miscarriage and by proxy performed an abortion).
But then again the law could be interpreted both ways; she could have been prosecuted for the death (by inciting her boyfriend to attack her). I know how misogynistic the courts can be, and it would not have surprised me in the least if this ever came to pass.
Since you're talking about this miscarriage law, I felt I should chime in.
Basically this law is crap. Any defense lawyer worth his or her salt would shred any attempt to prosecute based on this law. Reason being is that we have the assumption of innocence. The prosecutor would have to prove who or what caused the miscarriage beyond reasonable doubt, which is nearly impossible. And if the prosecutor ever said something like, "Well, the baby was inside her, so we can assume she was at fault somehow," the whole thing would get appealed so fast that they shouldn't even close their briefcases.
It's still a fucking embarrassment to have these idiots in our country. Sometimes I wish we could vote states out of the Union, because NOBODY would miss Mississippi.
duck wrote:Maringue wrote: Sometimes I wish we could vote states out of the Union, because NOBODY would miss Mississippi.
i lol'd
Saber wrote:I was reading The Economist earlier, and I saw this one reader letter that turned out to be satirical.
It went something like this:
Yup, this law is totally cool! In fact, because Mississippi is going to consider all fetuses and fertilized eggs babies, we're going to go down to Mississippi, collect those, keep them frozen in our basements and let them be children, and collect tax subsidies. We'd also buy a generator to keep them cold in case the power goes out. Anything less is bad parenting.
That's basically how it was. You'd have to read it directly to understand why it was so damn funny.
(Read The Economist. It's a very good magazine about stuff.)
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Saber wrote:I was reading The Economist earlier, and I saw this one reader letter that turned out to be satirical.
It went something like this:
Yup, this law is totally cool! In fact, because Mississippi is going to consider all fetuses and fertilized eggs babies, we're going to go down to Mississippi, collect those, keep them frozen in our basements and let them be children, and collect tax subsidies. We'd also buy a generator to keep them cold in case the power goes out. Anything less is bad parenting.
That's basically how it was. You'd have to read it directly to understand why it was so damn funny.
(Read The Economist. It's a very good magazine about stuff.)
Can you check their website to see if they have it posted there?
Saber wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Saber wrote:I was reading The Economist earlier, and I saw this one reader letter that turned out to be satirical.
It went something like this:
Yup, this law is totally cool! In fact, because Mississippi is going to consider all fetuses and fertilized eggs babies, we're going to go down to Mississippi, collect those, keep them frozen in our basements and let them be children, and collect tax subsidies. We'd also buy a generator to keep them cold in case the power goes out. Anything less is bad parenting.
That's basically how it was. You'd have to read it directly to understand why it was so damn funny.
(Read The Economist. It's a very good magazine about stuff.)
Can you check their website to see if they have it posted there?
Right, because I totally remembered that they have a website.
SIR – I was delighted to read your article about the effort in Mississippi to pass a state constitutional amendment to recognise embryos as people from the moment of fertilisation (“A person already?”, October 8th). My wife and I have been considering IVF to address our lack of success in conceiving a child. Mississippi’s proposed amendment gives us even more reason to pursue this treatment, and to move to Mississippi.
After the procedure we will insist on taking custody of any extra embryos that result from IVF—it is our right as parents after all. Once safely in our home we plan to keep them in a freezer in our basement and list them as child dependents for tax purposes, thus giving us a tax deduction. To protect the lives of our children in case of a power outage we will buy a backup generator. Anything less would be bad parenting.
Benjamin Iwai
St Louis, Missouri
loooooooooooooooool
Saber wrote:You call it a troll, I call it comedy. Close enough.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Saber wrote:You call it a troll, I call it comedy. Close enough.
I doubt this guy was trying to be funny. As I edited my above post to state, there actually are people who believe such things and would go to such lengths in real life.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:In the event he's not a troll, I'm not surprised. Missouri is full of hard-core rednecks; heck, they elected McCain in the '08 elections.
Wakka wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:In the event he's not a troll, I'm not surprised. Missouri is full of hard-core rednecks; heck, they elected McCain in the '08 elections.
:/
st louis is actually pretty reasonable
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Maybe, but I've been to the backwoods parts of Missouri and it's full of rednecks.
Techercizer wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Maybe, but I've been to the backwoods parts of Missouri and it's full of rednecks.
That's what makes any location "backwoods", is it not?
Guy wrote:No offense to anyone, but ya'll have no idea what I have to go threw any time I set out anywhere outside any major city in Texas.
I can't even change my tire without worrying about getting beaten to death by the "righteous".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest