Mongoose wrote:How is using photoshop unfair?
LegendarySurgeon wrote:Though modern popularization suggests the three wise men were following a star, it might be more apt to say they followed a sandvich.
LegendarySurgeon wrote:
Though modern popularization suggests the three wise men were following a star, it might be more apt to say they followed a sandvich.
Failhorse wrote:photoshop isn't fair as not everyone has it. Suck it up and get inventive. I've seen some insane work from the online editors.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Failhorse wrote:photoshop isn't fair as not everyone has it. Suck it up and get inventive. I've seen some insane work from the online editors.
1) I take serious offense to this rhetoric. This is the exact language that forced me to leave Newgrounds.
2) How about GIMP? It's free and anyone can use it.
NBC011795 wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Failhorse wrote:photoshop isn't fair as not everyone has it. Suck it up and get inventive. I've seen some insane work from the online editors.
1) I take serious offense to this rhetoric. This is the exact language that forced me to leave Newgrounds.
2) How about GIMP? It's free and anyone can use it.
Yes, I agree, Gimp would have saved me A LOT of trouble.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:1) I take serious offense to this rhetoric. This is the exact language that forced me to leave Newgrounds.
2) How about GIMP? It's free and anyone can use it.
Techercizer wrote:I wanted to use GIMP so bad; I could have actually done some real image manipulation instead of just importing, warping, colouring, and erasing...
Also, handicapping people who have spent large amounts of time familiarizing themselves with an industry standard tool just because a few entrants might not have it is like forcing contestants in American Idol to do all their songs in grunts because some contestants might not have English as their first language. Maybe people without photoshop will do even better than the ones with it, just using the resources at hand. Maybe they won't. Either way, you're not improving their submissions in the slightest; the only thing you might accomplish is making everyone else's submission harder to produce or of lower quality, which doesn't much support the ideal of fairness this decision seems designed to foster.
stanley the manley wrote:failhorse, what were you thinking trying to make a fair contest that everyone can participate in, and one in which everyone has a chance of winning, thats just plain stupid
Failhorse wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:1) I take serious offense to this rhetoric. This is the exact language that forced me to leave Newgrounds.
2) How about GIMP? It's free and anyone can use it.
What language exactly? Seriously. This is suppose to be a laid back image contest. I'm sorry if my rules for keeping a level playing field offend you. I'm not sorry for the fact you're lumping my rhetoric with a bunch of 12 year olds who play cartoonish dress up games. Seriously get fucked. Now that's something to be offended by.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:What I took offense to was your line "Suck it up and get inventive." In case you haven't been paying attention, last December Newgrounds made a blanket rule that stated no future submissions were to contain ANY outside material, copyrighted, Creative Commons or otherwise. The administrators justified this by claiming it would help users be more creative, yet in fact it was stifling creativity for some of us. Outraged and knowing there was nothing I could do, I left the site for good and never tried to make Flash again.
Cartoonish dress-up games are one of the only kinds of content allowed on the site these days. Pop-culture parodies, music videos, video game parodies, etc. are banned outright, justified with scare tactics involving DMCA takedown notices and lawsuits by big corporations.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:last December Newgrounds made a blanket rule blah blah blah.
GoDM1N wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:last December Newgrounds made a blanket rule blah blah blah.
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Failhorse wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:1) I take serious offense to this rhetoric. This is the exact language that forced me to leave Newgrounds.
2) How about GIMP? It's free and anyone can use it.
What language exactly? Seriously. This is suppose to be a laid back image contest. I'm sorry if my rules for keeping a level playing field offend you. I'm not sorry for the fact you're lumping my rhetoric with a bunch of 12 year olds who play cartoonish dress up games. Seriously get fucked. Now that's something to be offended by.
What I took offense to was your line "Suck it up and get inventive." In case you haven't been paying attention, last December Newgrounds made a blanket rule that stated no future submissions were to contain ANY outside material, copyrighted, Creative Commons or otherwise. The administrators justified this by claiming it would help users be more creative, yet in fact it was stifling creativity for some of us. Outraged and knowing there was nothing I could do, I left the site for good and never tried to make Flash again.
Cartoonish dress-up games are one of the only kinds of content allowed on the site these days. Pop-culture parodies, music videos, video game parodies, etc. are banned outright, justified with scare tactics involving DMCA takedown notices and lawsuits by big corporations.
Relevent
HibiscusKazeneko wrote:Failhorse wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:1) I take serious offense to this rhetoric. This is the exact language that forced me to leave Newgrounds.
2) How about GIMP? It's free and anyone can use it.
What language exactly? Seriously. This is suppose to be a laid back image contest. I'm sorry if my rules for keeping a level playing field offend you. I'm not sorry for the fact you're lumping my rhetoric with a bunch of 12 year olds who play cartoonish dress up games. Seriously get fucked. Now that's something to be offended by.
What I took offense to was your line "Suck it up and get inventive." In case you haven't been paying attention, last December Newgrounds made a blanket rule that stated no future submissions were to contain ANY outside material, copyrighted, Creative Commons or otherwise. The administrators justified this by claiming it would help users be more creative, yet in fact it was stifling creativity for some of us. Outraged and knowing there was nothing I could do, I left the site for good and never tried to make Flash again.
Cartoonish dress-up games are one of the only kinds of content allowed on the site these days. Pop-culture parodies, music videos, video game parodies, etc. are banned outright, justified with scare tactics involving DMCA takedown notices and lawsuits by big corporations.
Jake wrote:Philosiraptor was asked to step in with the price checking debate.
VoltySquirrel wrote:It's "discussions" like this one here that make me never post in the Admin Lounge.
Failhorse wrote:I've already given up on it and don't really care. It takes a lot to peeve me off. And i'm not talking the OMG ded from crits 4 times in a row pissed either. The utter stupidity of the whole argument can be summed up with a comparision to the time I got drunk and got into an argument with my kitchen table.
stanley the manley wrote:Failhorse wrote:I've already given up on it and don't really care. It takes a lot to peeve me off. And i'm not talking the OMG ded from crits 4 times in a row pissed either. The utter stupidity of the whole argument can be summed up with a comparision to the time I got drunk and got into an argument with my kitchen table.
next time, it would be great if you could record that
GoDM1N wrote:HibiscusKazeneko wrote:last December Newgrounds made a blanket rule blah blah blah.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest