doppelganger wrote:imagine a person from the future going back in time and pretending to be a god, thus creating the religions we know today.
Failhorse wrote:Why would someone who discovered an alternate reality come to the conclusion "time travel."
Smeemo wrote:Failhorse wrote:Why would someone who discovered an alternate reality come to the conclusion "time travel."
It sounds like you don't want to get too hard science-y, but theoretically, isn't time travel akin to dimensional travel? Maybe the scientist doesn't first think "time travel," but in trying to reach the timeline through dimensional travel, he comes to realize the role time plays.
All of this takes place in our universe? I've read theories of how our universe might just be one in a "foam" of universes...
Failhorse wrote:The basic premise of the story. A scientist discovers this other reality (ours.) Through research he finds that at some point in history the time line was changed. Later discovering he's the one who created this second reality by going back in time and accidentally changing the time line. Basically he's under the belief that his time line is the correct one, and the second was created due to his meddling in the first place.
GoDM1N wrote:Failhorse wrote:The basic premise of the story. A scientist discovers this other reality (ours.) Through research he finds that at some point in history the time line was changed. Later discovering he's the one who created this second reality by going back in time and accidentally changing the time line. Basically he's under the belief that his time line is the correct one, and the second was created due to his meddling in the first place.
Maybe after running endless experiments he should end up finding out that no matter what he does, he will go back in time, it isn't something he can control. He goes back and changes the future but not in the way you mentioned above. Instead of making it better he makes it worse because he wasn't suppose to use the time machine. People from the future were suppose to come back and take him to the past instead. From there he starts mucking about, causes the dark ages, and assumes he failed. The people from the future assume all is lost and this causes chaos to the more advanced people of what is actually the original future and they fall into the dark ages themselves and end up destroying the earth. Meanwhile our main character comes back to present time and everything is as he remembers it and he assumes he was actually successful. In 300 years the world becomes as advanced as the people in what was actually the original future and never fall into the dark ages a 2nd time in the future or destroying the earth
VoltySquirrel wrote:GoDM1N wrote:Failhorse wrote:The basic premise of the story. A scientist discovers this other reality (ours.) Through research he finds that at some point in history the time line was changed. Later discovering he's the one who created this second reality by going back in time and accidentally changing the time line. Basically he's under the belief that his time line is the correct one, and the second was created due to his meddling in the first place.
Maybe after running endless experiments he should end up finding out that no matter what he does, he will go back in time, it isn't something he can control. He goes back and changes the future but not in the way you mentioned above. Instead of making it better he makes it worse because he wasn't suppose to use the time machine. People from the future were suppose to come back and take him to the past instead. From there he starts mucking about, causes the dark ages, and assumes he failed. The people from the future assume all is lost and this causes chaos to the more advanced people of what is actually the original future and they fall into the dark ages themselves and end up destroying the earth. Meanwhile our main character comes back to present time and everything is as he remembers it and he assumes he was actually successful. In 300 years the world becomes as advanced as the people in what was actually the original future and never fall into the dark ages a 2nd time in the future or destroying the earth
You're kinda describing the plot of the Butterfly Effect there GoDM1N.
GoDM1N wrote:VoltySquirrel wrote:GoDM1N wrote:Maybe after running endless experiments he should end up finding out that no matter what he does, he will go back in time, it isn't something he can control. He goes back and changes the future but not in the way you mentioned above. Instead of making it better he makes it worse because he wasn't suppose to use the time machine. People from the future were suppose to come back and take him to the past instead. From there he starts mucking about, causes the dark ages, and assumes he failed. The people from the future assume all is lost and this causes chaos to the more advanced people of what is actually the original future and they fall into the dark ages themselves and end up destroying the earth. Meanwhile our main character comes back to present time and everything is as he remembers it and he assumes he was actually successful. In 300 years the world becomes as advanced as the people in what was actually the original future and never fall into the dark ages a 2nd time in the future or destroying the earth
You're kinda describing the plot of the Butterfly Effect there GoDM1N.
Haven't seen it. I hear its bad however, I must fail
VoltySquirrel wrote:The basic story itself is fine, but it clearly suffers from a case of try-hardness.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest